musicality
Mar. 14th, 2009 12:37 amDoes anyone know a good song with lyrics about being tied up, or knotted up, or some other thinly veiled bondage allusion? Preferably a lighter, faster song, ideally from the '60s-'70s.
[I could say this was for some purpose other than a wild bid to convince
gnine to make me a MUNCLE vid, but, well, that would be a blatant lie.]
It tickles me that there are vids for this fandom. Oh, Youtube, you are so kind! This one is a rather wonderfully fast-paced, violent Napoleon/Illya (with NCIS and Hustle clips, no less)...off to watch more!
ETA: There are not only vids for this fandom, but good vids! \o/
(these are all, how shall we say...pretty dang slashy. There might be some gen vids out there...though with this show? Yeah, maybe not. This, for example, is Illya's reaction to the prospect of girl smoochies...)
The Youtube Affair - By the same vidder as the above (you have to download the mediafire version, as the original song was pulled. It's worth the download. Also, adorable!)
The Russian Angel Affair - Just in case you've missed that Illya is in fact gorgeous. (4th season has given me a disturbing and unnatural fetish for the Beatles cut, at least on tiny attack-cat blonds. Oops?)
The Masochism Tango Affair - hee! (I still want Gnine to do her own take. But Tom Lehrer is always for the win!)
[I could say this was for some purpose other than a wild bid to convince
It tickles me that there are vids for this fandom. Oh, Youtube, you are so kind! This one is a rather wonderfully fast-paced, violent Napoleon/Illya (with NCIS and Hustle clips, no less)...off to watch more!
ETA: There are not only vids for this fandom, but good vids! \o/
(these are all, how shall we say...pretty dang slashy. There might be some gen vids out there...though with this show? Yeah, maybe not. This, for example, is Illya's reaction to the prospect of girl smoochies...)
The Youtube Affair - By the same vidder as the above (you have to download the mediafire version, as the original song was pulled. It's worth the download. Also, adorable!)
The Russian Angel Affair - Just in case you've missed that Illya is in fact gorgeous. (4th season has given me a disturbing and unnatural fetish for the Beatles cut, at least on tiny attack-cat blonds. Oops?)
The Masochism Tango Affair - hee! (I still want Gnine to do her own take. But Tom Lehrer is always for the win!)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 06:13 pm (UTC)Oh hon, he does things to us ALL! His supreme adorable cute badass snarky whipping boy awesomeness is unstoppable. Resistance is futile! ^_-
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:35 am (UTC)(...your iconic Monty Python monks are now whacking their heads in time with the music XD)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 08:41 pm (UTC)thank you so much for pointing me at those vids. i need to go squee now.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:40 am (UTC)ETA: Ahh, it's "Botticelli", according to her website. (are they playing Botticelli in it? Because that's awful fannish of her if so; they never do that in the show, only in the tie-in novels, and hence in the fic...she actually is a fangirl?)
(I am wondering what the heck meta-slash is! could you gimme a hint? ^^;)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 06:06 am (UTC)It's a very non-linear story, a series of snippets. The basic thread that holds it together is that these two spies, inasmuch as I remember, are waiting in a hotel room for something to happen, and playing a game and verbally sparring while they wait. But there are a whole bunch of what-ifs -- AUs or just "what this could mean" -- it's sort of like shuffling a pack of cards displaying different variations on their relationship and exploring that. Being the fangirl that I am, I assumed within a couple of pages that she was talking about fanfic, though the story doesn't spell it out.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 06:27 am (UTC)*I wrote this as an ETA before you replied, so having read your take - ahhh, it's very interesting from a non-MUNCLE-fan perspective. It's not really AU, and the what-ifs aren't contradictory...also she knows her canon/fanon very well. (Actually I guess it could be a meta-effort to integrate all the fanon she could find, but then, doesn't a lot of fic do the same?)
...I get weirded out by fanfic profic because I sometimes get the feeling that people unfamiliar with fic think they're reading something strikingly original, rather than part of a long tradition. It's akin to how some martial arts movie fen were annoyed by the special attention The Matrix or Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon got, because they were using techniques new and amazing to unfamiliar audiences, but not actually innovative, and it's frustrating to see previous efforts go unacknowledged.
OTOH, pro-fanfic can be good for getting the mainstream to acknowledge fanfic's merits...
(in completely unrelated news, icon <3: Mitchell = SO PURTY~!)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 06:34 am (UTC)Well, you're getting my vague recollections of a story I read last year and didn't really like all that much, so ... XD
See, I agree; it really made me twitchy because it felt like fanfic dressed up and called profic, and I was not comfortable with that. Obviously I don't have a problem with fanfic, and I don't have a problem with tie-in novels; it's just that this one felt ... deceptive? A little bit? I could see what she was trying to do with it, I think -- I read it as a commentary on the maybe-AU, maybe-not-AU nature of slash. But it came out feeling like a fanfic with the names removed.
It's akin to how some martial arts movie fen were annoyed by the special attention The Matrix or Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon got, because they were using techniques new and amazing to unfamiliar audiences, but not actually innovative, and it's frustrating to see previous efforts go unacknowledged.
ahahaha, that's exactly how I felt about all the attention that was paid to The Matrix, and everyone who was falling all over themselves about the "original" twist in the middle. I kept wanting to say, "You people need to read some science fiction, STAT!" XD
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 06:59 am (UTC)Buy, yes...twitchy. And deceptive - that's it, exactly. This is one of those cases that I find myself questioning the author's intent. If she were a known fanfic writer, like say Astolat, I would be quite sure she was seeking to get fic into the mainstream, trying to sneak it in and prove to people that yes, we do good stuff. But Bear's not a fic'cer (or is she? I don't actually know much about her) and the fic wasn't published in a fan setting, wasn't presented to a fan audience. It's a commentary on slash but it's not being read by slashers...
ahahaha, that's exactly how I felt about all the attention that was paid to The Matrix, and everyone who was falling all over themselves about the "original" twist in the middle. I kept wanting to say, "You people need to read some science fiction, STAT!"
Heeeeh, the scifi of The Matrix was SO BAD I didn't want the comparison! But I did find the gunbattles & such awesome, and something I hadn't seen before and enjoyed the movie for it, while as fans of the martial arts genre were like, "wait, if you like that so much, why haven't you watched all the movies it was ripping off?"
--I guess that's what it is - whether something feels like a homage or a rip-off. And that's subjective, but if you don't know how the author actually feels about the original...I don't know if Bear respects fanfic, or thinks herself better than it (even though she clearly reads it!), and that's...uncomfortable.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 07:45 am (UTC)I think it's interesting that it tweaked me as badly as it did, because I do believe strongly in fanfic as an art form; it's just that I've also (apparently) very heavily internalized the idea that it shouldn't cross paths with profic -- that it's something different, in which two of the big "rules" are that you don't charge for it, and you always cite your inspirations by name. Profic, of course, works the opposite: you do charge for it, and you conceal your inspirations as carefully as possible. A story that wears its inspirations openly but still bills itself as original fiction weirds me out, and this is despite my firmly held belief that nothing is truly original, that even so-called original fiction is still drawing from somewhere.
The thing is, I don't think my position is particularly defensible -- in fact, I don't want to defend it; I'd rather live in a world where stories can riff on other stories without running afoul of copyright law, and where I don't feel like I have to carefully scrub my original fiction of even the most veiled references to the stories that inspired it. But it still made me feel very twitchy and weird.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 08:10 am (UTC)A story that wears its inspirations openly but still bills itself as original fiction weirds me out, and this is despite my firmly held belief that nothing is truly original, that even so-called original fiction is still drawing from somewhere.
So is the dissonance in acknowledgment? In fandom, with no money on the line, ownership/acknowledgment is king; plagiarism is the ultimate offense. Most of us don't put the "not our chars" disclaimer on our fic these days, because it's not a help legally; but it's absolutely understood by everyone reading that the chars are someone else's. And also, when you're posting in part of a fan community, it's also understood that you may be calling on fanon; that not all your ideas are your own.
While as in pro-fic, originality is supposed to be king (even though that's largely a ridiculous illusion, as both genre fiction and mainstream literature draw immensely on everything that came before them.) So a fanfic masquerading as a pro-fic is betraying that originality mandate, and then it's also betraying the fanfic author's responsibility to admit they're using characters not their own.
I'd be more comfortable with the story if it had the standard one line disclaimer, "these characters are the property of the MUNCLE creators" (with the implicit, unstated disclaimer, "and certain elements been influenced by MUNCLE fandom"). But then it couldn't be published under current copyright law...
(I'm less weirded out by the question of profit - probably because I don't spend as much time in pro-fic communities as you. I want to go pro, but I don't draw as firm a line between pro- and fan-fic. Or maybe it's because my first fanfic experience was pro Star Trek novels? And I've posted original fic online? So, I see lines between pro-fic and free-fic, and then lines between original-fic and fanfic; and they correlate but they're not quite the same. But this story is at an awkward intersection, regardless...)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 08:47 am (UTC)Like I said, I don't think my position is particularly defensible; it's more like a squick than a legitimate moral objection. Fanfic wearing the clothes of original fiction squicks me, but that doesn't make it wrong ... just something that takes some getting used to.
So a fanfic masquerading as a pro-fic is betraying that originality mandate, and then it's also betraying the fanfic author's responsibility to admit they're using characters not their own.
*nods* That's it, basically. It's a violation of the social conventions of both fanfic and profic. Which still doesn't make it wrong -- actually, it's very interesting to hold those ideas up to the light and examine them, because they're basically a response to the legal requirements of copyright. The concept that originality is king ... that's something very new; it would have been quite alien to writers and storytellers of previous centuries. But the legal requirement has become entrenched in the morality of both the profic and fanfic writing communities; fanfic writers are quick to call each other out for plagiarism or lack of proper attribution or acknowledgement, even though there's no chance that anyone would ever have actual legal action brought against them for plagiarizing a fanfic, or for sticking a minor Marvel character into an SGA fic without properly identifying him! So it feels very weird to see someone doing it. And I also agree with your point, below, that it's very difficult to engage with it as fanfic; I actually have the same problem with fanfic that reads like an original story, including some of the better SGA AUs -- it's hard to engage with it as fanfic, and as original fic, at the same time.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 07:53 am (UTC)I guess that's what it is - whether something feels like a homage or a rip-off.
Right! It is subjective ... I read a book some years back that was blatantly, obviously ripping off Star Wars, but had reworked the world-building and internal mythos so that you couldn't quite hold it up and say "Look! It's Luke, Han, Leia and Darth Vader! Call the lawyers!" ... although, hmm, I just realized it was basically retelling the story of Star Wars with the same (renamed) characters, as opposed to doing what fanfic does, and filling in the gaps in canon. I wonder how much of a difference that makes. It still feels unethical to take the characters, rename them and call them your own, though. But the Botticelli story doesn't really do that -- as long as you have a passing familiarity with the concept of fanfic, it's obvious that's what it's riffing on (and I recognized it as such even without any knowledge of canon). Of course, if you don't know, then you'll think it's original, like the reviewers. The same is true of any in-joke, I guess ... although you could also argue that if the entire story depends for its impact on the reader getting the in-joke, then the writer needs to include the decoding key along with the coded message. Otherwise it kinda smacks of "more clever than thou".
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 08:19 am (UTC)Is that the difference between a rip-off and a homage? A homage is done with the expectation that everyone will get the reference, while a rip-off is hoping that no one will notice. Which is, of course, somewhat subjective, because the author might've genuinely thought they were being obvious, when actually they ended up being obscure...
(And the Botticelli story, from this definition, I think is more homage, because the story itself doesn't really make sense unless you get what it's riffing on, so Bear did intend it to be obvious...)
ETA: The irony is, if this story had been a fanfic, I would've quite liked it - it's actually pretty close to how I see the Napoleon/Illya dynamic, and it's got some nice h/c moments. But I'm having a hard time enjoying it because it's so...self-conscious about those moments? I feel like I'm supposed to be appreciating their thoughtful meta, rather than squeeing, when I'd rather be squeeing...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 07:15 am (UTC)The funny thing is, if she'd posted it as a fanfic, I'm sure a lot of fans would've enjoyed it - but now I feel like she's getting credit for something not her invention. Even though she does admit right on her site that it's a fanfic...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 11:54 pm (UTC)You don't have caps, do you...? Some good face reference shots... I'm not saying it'd work out well, but I just got an idea for a picture.
...Dangit.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-14 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-14 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 05:42 am (UTC)