SPN mini-commentary
Feb. 5th, 2010 02:53 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Regarding SPN 5x12 and 5x13:
5x12: a criminal waste of a good body swap. Phooey.
5x13: DANGIT SHOW, why'd you have to go and do that? I liked Anna, quite a lot - rebellious angels of all stripes are a major draw for me. Having her go evil (and stupidly evil no less - she actually achieved her objective, she killed Sam, and then rather than go and immediately scatter his atoms across the cosmos - back in time, no less, it probably would've taken some effort to straighten that out - she continued to go for the brutal murder. ARGH.) and then get killed is just annoying.
I also believe this means that every single female character who appeared in more than two episodes is now dead. Seriously, show, the hell? Even Castiel h/c can't make up for that.
(not to say that I didn't enjoy those bits. But I would've enjoyed them a lot more in a different context.)
Also finished s4 Buffy/s1 Angel. Yay friendship! Yay h/c! Yay Spike in tweed on a swingset! (Joss Whedon is a Twin Peaks/David Lynch fan, y/y?)
5x12: a criminal waste of a good body swap. Phooey.
5x13: DANGIT SHOW, why'd you have to go and do that? I liked Anna, quite a lot - rebellious angels of all stripes are a major draw for me. Having her go evil (and stupidly evil no less - she actually achieved her objective, she killed Sam, and then rather than go and immediately scatter his atoms across the cosmos - back in time, no less, it probably would've taken some effort to straighten that out - she continued to go for the brutal murder. ARGH.) and then get killed is just annoying.
I also believe this means that every single female character who appeared in more than two episodes is now dead. Seriously, show, the hell? Even Castiel h/c can't make up for that.
(not to say that I didn't enjoy those bits. But I would've enjoyed them a lot more in a different context.)
Also finished s4 Buffy/s1 Angel. Yay friendship! Yay h/c! Yay Spike in tweed on a swingset! (Joss Whedon is a Twin Peaks/David Lynch fan, y/y?)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 11:41 am (UTC)And what is it that I hear? Is there trouble brewing on the set of NCIS? I thought Mark Harmon partially took over as producer after Bellisario left? :(
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 01:28 pm (UTC)SPN I'm way behind on (like, I didn't know yet that youknowwho were killed, see comments below arrggh). ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:26 pm (UTC)Will hope it works out - NCIS is one of my happy places, hate to lose it!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:09 pm (UTC)(truthfully, SPN kinda died for me at the end of season 2 when they torched the Roadhouse and Ash apparently died in a fire. I still watch it on DVD but my interest is very mild)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:14 pm (UTC)...No, Jo & Ellen were killed off a few eps ago. After being brought back a few eps before that. Apparently just so they could be killed.
ARGH!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:28 pm (UTC)At this point at least half the reason I watch is just to see what stupid thing they're doing this time, I admit...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:16 pm (UTC)Oh show *shakes head* There have been some fun things in the later seasons (Castiel!) but for the most part, I agree, season 1 and 2 were the best...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:18 pm (UTC)And - oooh, end of S4 is the awesome dream sequence? I did love that ep...!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 12:30 pm (UTC)And yup, crazy dreams are crazy! Fun stuff, the surreality was a trip!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 01:30 pm (UTC)But you know, what's really annyoing me this season? All the baffling storytelling choices. It's the Apocalypse, dammit, and still we get one filler episode after another, each with maybe one plot-relevant line. If the production team aren't giving a shit, why should I?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:30 pm (UTC)And yeah, the Apocalypse storyline...I've been trying to figure out if they've been counting all season on getting renewed, so are trying to draw it out through s6; or if they're just really bad at writing epic stories...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 02:06 pm (UTC)I really love SPN but I don't know why they refuse to get with it on this particular issue.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:35 pm (UTC)Yeah, they could've sent any angel after the boys! Or another sort of being! Or even had Anna do it but change her mind last-minute! Or have her get away when Michael came! So many options, but no, killing yet another woman was the way to go. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 05:13 pm (UTC)(Also, I wonder how much more incest is being written thanks to this episode.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 09:36 pm (UTC)And yeah, the Michael/Lucifer seems about as strong as the Dean/Sam, appropriately enough...!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-06 02:59 pm (UTC)I know I'll get hammered for saying this, but there are only two characters the show cares about and that are Sam and Dean. The end. If all the side characters were white men, then the show would get hassled for not having diversity...when they do cast characters other than white men, they get hassled for killing them.
I guess the main problem is that everyone on she show ends up dead or evil, which they are consistent in doing. Lol I do think they could keep a side cast without bumping them off at every turn though, you’ll hear an amen on that :D
As far as filler eppys vs. myth arc, no one seems to be happy.
It seems half my f-list is sick and tired of the apocalypse and wants more 'monster of the week' eppys, while they other half wants more myth arc eppys vs. filler ones. And that's a problem the show has had since they made a major turn at the end of season.
But to be honest I only watch the NCIS(s) and SPN, so I do watch for entrainment purposes only and I still enjoy watching the heck out of all of them.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-06 09:35 pm (UTC)As for apocalypse vs MotW - I'd prefer they picked one or the other, but either way I don't care that much. I've never watched SPN for the plot!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-06 09:47 pm (UTC)I think the problem lies within a very vocal fan base that I think for once, TPTB paid too much attention to. Everyone in their mother has hated every female character on the show or has b*tched about them in the places that the producers read (hence why I skip most SPN posts elsewhere). I recall when Jo and Ellen were first introduced how much the fans screamed. Same goes for Ruby. Of course it's because they don't want anyone 'touching their boys', but I've seen on many occasions where Kripe said he wrote off a character based on fan response and I guess when you are dependent on 3 million or less he's way to sensitive to that. And that can be a bit scary.
I loved Jo and Ellen they just were not on the show enough and when they brought them back to only kill them, yeah that hurt. But, I used to analyze the shows I loved a lot and ended up getting caught up in the negative aspects and running the fun out of them. But as you said, I don’t watch the show too much for plot and I still love it a lot despite some of its issues.
And the funny thing is that SPN has more female writers than on any show I've ever watched. Now that doesn’t make you scratch your head :-P
Thanks for ‘discussing’ it with me. I’m normally very scared to talk about this show except with a few select few :D
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 07:55 am (UTC)And yeah, while I think female writers/showrunners are important - most of the shows I know with awesome female chars have women in high places - they're not the only factor, as SPN shows!
Ahh, I can totally understand not wanting to analyze your shows too much for fear of losing the fun of them. Lately I've been mostly avoiding the meta-fandom discussions that have been going around because I've found they take a lot of the enjoyment out of fandom itself for me. At least at the moment, I'm happier sticking to my smaller circles, quietly discussing things with people like yourself without getting into huge and often unintentionally hurtful debates...
At least I have NCIS - that show's my happy place, and since it's laid off the politics I got no complaints ^^
no subject
Date: 2010-02-08 09:45 pm (UTC)One thing I was saying at someone else's LJ ... well, I'll just paste my comment rather than trying to paraphrase:
I think it's becoming more and more obvious that what they should have done to make [the mytharc] work -- what they started to do back in season two and then pulled away from for some reason -- is to world-build like crazy, because what they need at this point, I think, is a large cast of supporting players and world-building concepts to draw upon. Instead, they've been introducing supporting characters and artifacts Maguffin-style and then getting rid of them, which doesn't really leave them much to play with. At this point they're pretty much just reduced to going in circles with both the plot and Sam & Dean's interactions with each other.
... which is really where I'm at with the series: it feels like they've been retreading the same territory with Sam and Dean for two seasons now (if not longer), and they just don't have the universe to support the long-arc plot that they're trying to do. They've already plumbed the depths of their main characters' relationship to each other ad infinitum, and their relationship with their parents, and now they're left with the claustrophobic results of having systematically killed off everyone else who's important to them (except for Bobby, but that's another relationship that's pretty much been plumbed to its depths) and having nowhere left to go emotionally.
I did, somewhat against my will *g*, really enjoy the Castiel h/c and his loyalty to Sam (though, I really didn't feel like the show had adequately set up for it -- "Sam is my friend" since when?).
no subject
Date: 2010-02-08 10:17 pm (UTC)As to everything else you say, oh, yes, I had the same thought before. SPN is an amazing explanation of why you cannot tell an epic story with 3 main chars (I'm thinking Sam & Dean and then Bobby and Cas as a 1/2 each :P) It locks those main chars into repeating patterns, and at the same time it focuses the audience's view so tightly that we don't get a sense of scale. Epic stories are about saving the world/universe, but Sam & Dean's universe is really really tiny, and we haven't been given much reason to care for the rest of it.
That's one of the reasons I like Castiel, because he's newer, and his relationships with Sam & Dean haven't been fixed yet - those bits of Castiel h/c, though not as extreme as what happened with the Winchesters even within the episode, were some of the most h/c I've enjoyed on SPN for seasons, because they were new and different. But yeah, him being friends with Sam was out of left field (easier to explain from the Dean/Cas perspective, really - "I can't let you kill my boyfriend's brother, I'll never get sex again!")